Developing implementation research projects with an intersectional gender lens


  1. Incorporating intersectional gender analysis into research on infectious diseases of poverty [website]. Geneva: Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases; 2020 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  2. Connell R. Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science & Medicine. 2012;74(11):1675–83.
  3. Gender and health [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  4. Gender mainstreaming for health managers: a practical approach (Participant’s notes). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  5. Tannenbaum C, Greaves L, Graham ID. Why sex and gender matter in implementation research. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2016;16(1):1–9 (–016–0247–7, accessed 3 April 2022).
  6. Hankivsky O. Intersectionality 101. Burnaby: The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy; 2014 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  7. Bowleg L. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(7):1267–73.
  8. TDR Implementation research toolkit. Geneva: Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases; 2020 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  9. Gender mainstreaming for health managers: a practical approach (Facilitators’ guide). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  10. Oshi DC, Oshi SN, Alobu IN, Ukwaja KN. Gender-related factors influencing women’s health seeking for tuberculosis care in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2016;48(1):37–50 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  11. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum; 1989 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  12. Shimmin C, Wittmeier KDM, Lavoie JG, Wicklund ED, Sibley KM. Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: The incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis. BMC Health Services Research. 2017;17(539) (–017–2463–1, accessed 3 April 2022).
  13. Larson E, George A, Morgan R, Poteat T. 10 Best resources on... intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy and Planning. 2016;31(8):964–9 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  14. Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: Implications of intersectionality. Social Science and Medicine. 2012;74(11):1712–20.
  15. Simpson J. Everyone belongs: A toolkit for applying intersectionality. Ottawa: Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women; 2009 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  16. Morgan R, George A, Ssali S, Hawkins K, Molyneux S, Theobald S. How to do (or not to do)... gender analysis in health systems research. Health Policy and Planning. 2016;31(8):1069–78 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  17. Gender analysis toolkit for health systems [website]. Baltimore: JHPIEGO; 2016 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  18. Taking sex and gender into account in emerging infectious disease programme: an analytical framework. Manila: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific: 2011 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  19. Lucas H, Zwarenstein M. A practical guide to implementation research on health systems. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2016 (, accessed 3 April 2022)
  20. Kabia E, Mbau R, Muraya KW, Morgan R, Molyneux S, Barasa E. How do gender and disability influence the ability of the poor to benefit from pro-poor health financing policies in Kenya? An intersectional analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2018;17(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12939–018–0853–6.
  21. Day S, Mason R, Tannenbaum C, Rochon PA. Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0182812. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182812.
  22. Abrams JA, Tabaac A, Jung S, Else-Quest NM. Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research. Social Science and Medicine. 2020;258.
  23. Ross LE. An account from the inside: Examining the emotional impact of qualitative research through the lens of “insider” research. Qualitative Psychology. 2017;4(3):326–37.
  24. Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, Esmail LC, Ramsey SD, Veenstra DL, et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. 2012;1(2):181 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  25. Boaz A, Hanney S, Borst R, O’Shea A, Kok M. How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2018;16(1):1–9 (–018–0337–6, accessed 3 April 2022).
  26. George AS, Mehra V, Scott K, Sriram V. Community participation in health systems research: A systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141091 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  27. Glandon D, Paina L, Alonge O, Peters DH, Bennett S. 10 Best resources for community engagement in implementation research. Health Policy and Planning. 2017;32(10):1457–65 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  28. Ahmad MS, Abu Talib NB. Empowering local communities: decentralization, empowerment and community driven development. Quality and Quantity. 2015;49(2):827–38.
  29. Hailemariam M, Felton JW, Key K, Greer DO, Jefferson BL, Muhammad J, et al. Intersectionality, special populations, needs and suggestions: The Flint Women’s study. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2020;19(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12939–020–1133–9.
  30. Dean L, Ozano K, Adekeye O, Dixon R, Fung EG, Gyapong M, et al. Neglected tropical diseases as a “litmus test” for universal health coverage? understanding who is left behind and why in mass drug administration: Lessons from four country contexts. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2019;13(11):e0007847. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0007847.
  31. Durey A, McEvoy S, Swift-Otero V, Taylor K, Katzenellenbogen J, Bessarab D. Improving healthcare for Aboriginal Australians through effective engagement between community and health services. BMC Health Services Research. 2016;16(1):1–13 (–016–1497–0, accessed 3 April 2022).
  32. De Weger E, Van Vooren N, Luijkx KG et al. Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review. BMC Health Service Research. 2018;18:285 (2018). doi:10.1186/s12913–018–3090–1.
  33. Hyder A, Syed S, Puvanachandra P, Bloom G, Sundaram S, Mahmood S et al. Stakeholder analysis for health research: case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Public Health. 2010;124(3):159–66. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.006.
  34. Choo HY, Ferree MM. Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory. 2010;28(2):129–49. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9558.2010.01370.x.
  35. Warner LR. A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles. 2008;59:454–63 (–008–9504–5, accessed 3 April 2022).
  36. van Olmen J, Marchal B, van Damme W, Kegels G, Hill PS. Health systems frameworks in their political context: framing divergent agendas. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:774 (–2458/12/774, accessed 3 April 2022).
  37. Sacks E, Morrow M, Story WT, Shelley KD, Shanklin D, Rahimtoola M, et al. Beyond the building blocks: integrating community roles into health systems frameworks to achieve health for all Analysis. BMJ Global Health. 2019;3:1384 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  38. Nowatzki N, Grant KR. Sex is not enough: The need for gender-based analysis in health research. Health Care for Women International. 2011;32(4):263–77.
  39. Östlin P, Eckermann E, Mishra US, Nkowane M, Wallstam E. Gender and health promotion: A multisectoral policy approach. Health Promotion International. 2006;21(suppl_1):25–35 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  40. Mclemore MR, Choo EK, Shutterstock K. The right decisions need the right voices. The Lancet. 2019;394:1133. doi:10.1080/135578.
  41. McLemore MR, Altman MR, Cooper N, Williams S, Rand L, Franck L. Health care experiences of pregnant, birthing and postnatal women of color at risk for preterm birth. Social Science & Medicine. 2018;201:127–135. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.013.
  42. Morgan R, Tetui M, Kananura RM, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, George AS. Gender dynamics affecting maternal health and health care access and use in Uganda. Health Policy and Planning. 2017;32:v13–21 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  43. Peters DH, Tran NT, Adam T. Implementation research in health: a practical guide. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research and World Health Organization; 2013 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  44. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2010;38(2):65–76 (–010–0319–7, accessed 3 April 2022).
  45. O’Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Clarke M, et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: Using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;67(1):56–64 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  46. Mena E, Bolte G. Intersectionality-based quantitative health research and sex/gender sensitivity: a scoping review. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2019;18:199. doi:10.1186/s12939–019–1098–8.
  47. Morris M, Bunjun B. Using intersectional feminist frameworks in research: A resource for embracing the complexities of women’s lives. Ottawa: Canadian Research Institute for Advancement of Women; 2007 (’s_lives, accessed 3 April 2022).
  48. Jayakumar B, Murthy N, Misra K, Burza S. “It’s just a fever”: Gender based barriers to care-seeking for visceral leishmaniasis in highly endemic districts of India: A qualitative study. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2019;13(6):e0007457. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0007457.
  49. Zhang T, Shi W, Huang Z, Gao D, Guo Z, Chongsuvivatwong V. Gender and ethnic health disparities among the elderly in rural Guangxi, China: estimating quality-adjusted life expectancy. Global Health Action. 2016;9(1) (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  50. Akhtar I. Research Design. In: Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Kanpur: Social Research Foundation; 2016 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  51. A manual for integrating gender into reproductive health and HIV programs: From commitment to action (2nd edition). Washington DC: Population Reference Bureau; 2009 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  52. Greaves L, Pederson A, Poole N (Eds). Making it better: Gender transformative health promotion. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press – Women’s Press; 2014.
  53. Bauer G, Bowleg L, Rouhani S, Scheim A, Blot S. Harnessing the power of intersectionality: Guidelines for quantitative intersectional health inequities research. London: Canada; 2014 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  54. Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues. 1946; 2(4):34–46 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  55. Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health. 2008:325–50 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  56. Loewenson R, Laurell AC, D’ambruoso L, Shroff Z. Participatory action research in health systems: A methods reader. Harare: Training and Research Support Centre Regional Network on Equity in Health in East and Southern Africa; 2014 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  57. Weber AM, Cislaghi B, Meausoone V, Abdalla S, Mejía-Guevara I, Loftus P, et al. Gender norms and health: insights from global survey data. The Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2455–68 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  58. Cole ER. Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist. 2009;64(3):170–80.
  59. Mosavel M, Ahmed R, Simon C. Perceptions of gender-based violence among South African youth: Implications for health promotion interventions. Health Promotion International. 2012;27(3):323–30 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  60. Shaghaghi A, Bhopal RS, Sheikh A. Approaches to recruiting “hard-to-reach” populations into research: A review of the literature. Health Promotion Perspective. 2011;1(2):86–94 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  61. Ott MA, Campbell J, Imburgia TM, Yang Z, Tu W, Auerswald CL. Community engagement and venue-based sampling in adolescent male sexually transmitted infection prevention research. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2018;62(3):S58–64.
  62. Taherdoost H. Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management. 2016;5(2):18–27 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  63. Whitehead D, Lopez V. Sampling data and data collection in qualitative research. In: Schneider Z, Whitehead D, LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J, editors. Nursing & midwifery research: Methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice (4th edition). Sydney: Elsevier – Mosby; 2013 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  64. Hunting G. Intersectionality-informed qualitative research: A primer. Burnaby: The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy; 2014 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  65. Hankivsky O, Reid C, Cormier R, Varcoe C, Clark N, Benoit C, et al. Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women’s health research. International Journal for Equity in Health 2010;9(1):1–15 (–9276–9-5, accessed 3 April 2022).
  66. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
  67. Olanrewaju FO, Ajayi A, Loromeke E, Olanrewaju A, Allo T, Nwannebuife O, et al. Masculinity and men’s health-seeking behaviour in Nigerian academia. Cogent Social Sciences. 2018;26(1):1682111 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  68. Fehrenbacher AE, Patel DR. Translating the theory of intersectionality into quantitative and mixed methods for empirical gender transformative research on health. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2019;22:145–160. doi:10.1080/13691058.2019.1671494.
  69. Jasmine A. Abrams, Ariella Tabaac, Sarah Jung, Nicole M. Else-Quest. Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research. Social Science & Medicine. 2020; 258:113138. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138.
  70. Henrickson M, Giwa S, Hafford-Letchfield T, Cocker C, Mulé NJ, Schaub J, et al. Research ethics with gender and sexually diverse persons. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17:1–13. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186615.
  71. Freimuth VS, Quinn SC, Thomas SB, Cole G, Zook E, Duncan T. African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee syphilis study. Social Science and Medicine. 2001;52(5):797–808.
  72. Nieuwenhoven L, Klinge I. Scientific excellence in applying sex-and gender-sensitive methods in biomedical and health research. Journal of Women’s Health. 2010;19(2):313–21. doi:10.1089/jwh.2008.1156.
  73. Trbovc JM, Hofman A. Toolkit for integrating gender-sensitive approach into research and teaching. Trento: GARCIA Project; 2015 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  74. Windsong EA. Incorporating intersectionality into research design: An example using qualitative interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2018;21(2):135–47 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  75. Intersectional approaches to equality research and data. York: Advance HE; 2017 (, accessed 3 April 2022).
  76. Padgett DK. Qualitative methods in social work research (second edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc; 2008 (, accessed 3 April 2022).